St. Ann's update- Thursday, July 15th, 2010: got the City's argument

St. Ann's update- Thursday, July 15th, 2010: got the City's argument

-

everything on track. Its very tidy, which I can appreciate.

There will be a few fun things that are brought up. Essentially, the City is asking for a Section 1 exemption for a legislated deprivation of life, which is funny because part of their argument is that David and I 'have not made a substansive case that Section 7 (or for that matter Section 15) of the Charter has been infringed.'... then why is the City asking for a Section 1 exemption for a transgression that doesn't exist?

Then it continues on to quote the two Provincial Court judges that said the daytime denial was reasonable.

I enjoyed the 'conclusion' where it says our argument to be able to set ip tents during the day is 'without merit'. That 'It would create an imbalance in society between an accommodating public majority and an uncompromising minority." I guess, sort of like slavery in the old-south... whatever happened with that, anyway?...

You've reason to be very very sad, almost unarticulatably sad. The moment that sadness becomes despair you dishonour everything you are sad about. Patience be with you... how much suffering must you endure before you get the benefit of confidence gained from accepting that a short fearless life is preferable to a long ...life hiding? Only with humility can we look God in the face.

See you on the other side...

David Arthur Johnston

Victoria, BC, Canada

Transwarp8000@Yahoo.com

Home page- http://www.angelfire.com/apes/hatrackman

Journal of the Occupation of St. Ann's Academy (Victoria, BC, Canada)- http://www.angelfire.com/apes/hatrackman/welcome.htm